Is Justice Profitable? Essay -- Glaucon Philosophy Philosophical Essay

Is Justice Profitable?Glaucon attempted to prove that injustice is pet to justice. At first, Glacon agreed with Socrates that justice is a good thing, but implored on the nature of its goodness? He listed three types of good that which is good for its consume sake (such as playing games), that which is good is good in itself and has utilizable consequences (such as reading), and that which is painful but has good consequences (such as surgery). Socrates replied that justice belongs in the fairest class, that which a man who is to be happy must love two for its own sake and for the results. (45d) Glaucon then reaffirmed Thrasymachuss position that inequitable flock lead a punter life than just sight. He started that creation just is simply a formality for maintaining a good temper and for achieving ones goals. He claimed that the only reason why a person would choose to be unjust rather than just referable to the fear of punishment. This is supported by the story of the she pherd who became corrupted as a result of finding a ring which make him invisible. He took over the kingdom through murder and intrigue since he knew in that respect could be no repercussions for his unjust actions. In addition, Adiamantus stated that unjust people did not need to fear divine punishment since appeals could be made to Gods egos via sacrifices. Finally, Glaucon gave an example of the extreme unjust person who has accumulated great riches and power which he juxtaposed with an extreme moral man who is being punished unjustly for his crimes. Clearly, injustice is preferable to justice since it put forwards for a more(prenominal) fruitful life.Is justice profitable?Glacons argument to Socrates may come forth genuinely convincing at first glance. People who succeed in li... ...s less likely.Last but not least, injustice does not provide the most good for the most number of people. Just acts spawn other just acts just like unjust acts spawn other unjust acts. If ev eryone behaved unjustly, mankind would return to a state of nature (everyone is for themselves) which would be very unprofitable for the unjust individual due to a decreased likelihood of survival. An action is clearly unprofitable for the unjust individual if it would eventually make up a hostile environment for him. Hence, one should set an example for others by living a just life which would create a better environment for him as well as for others.To sum up, justice is more profitable than injustice because it does not lead to true happiness, it gives way to opening of punishment, and it creates a pattern of behavior which if universalized would lead to disaster.